Skip to main content

McGrew v. State

Citations

  • 673 N.E.2d 787
  • 1996 Ind. App. LEXIS 1602
  • 1996 WL 682397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the improper admission of hearsay testimony from two witnesses whose testimony was “brief and consistent with” the victim’s testimony did not “constitute drumbeat repetition of the victim’s statements”
  • rejecting the defendant’s claim that testimony consistent with the victim’s was impermissible drumbeat repetition evidence
  • declining to find reversible error where, although the victim was not the first to testify, the challenged testimony was “brief and consistent with” the victim’s later testimony
  • declining to find reversible error where, although the victim was not the first to testify, the challenged testimony was “brief and consistent with” the victim’s later testimony
  • improper admission of hearsay testimony from two witnesses whose testimony was “brief and consistent with” the victim’s testimony did not “constitute drumbeat repetition of the victim’s statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Friedlander, Chezem

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.