Iacobelli Construction, Inc. v. County of Monroe, Rochester Pure Waters District, and Calocerinos & Spina Consulting Engineers, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Daubert sought only to clarify the standard for evaluating “scientific knowledge” under Rule 702
• A party may present expert affidavits based on summarizing the applicable documents to resist summary judgment.
• Daubert clarified standards for evaluating scientific knowledge only and, therefore, does not apply to exclude affidavits of geotechnical and underground-construction experts who were retained to summarize and interpret voluminous, technical data
• medical testimony about problems with contraceptive device

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).