McGough v. G & A, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court must consider the overall substance and effect of the whole of the evidence and not just the witness’s, use of “any magical words or phrases”
• noting that \[t]he court may not consider deposition or affidavit testimony that directly contradicts earlier deposition or affidavit testimony without adequate explanation\
• noting that \[t]he court may not consider deposition or affidavit testimony that directly contradicts earlier deposition or affidavit testimony without adequate explanation\
• stating that, in deciding whether deposition testimony meets substantial-evidence test, court must not consider excerpts of testimony abstractly, but must consider the deposition testimony as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).