Continental Eagle Corp. v. Mokrzycki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues not raised at the trial level cannot be considered for the first time on appeal
• holding that contradictory deposition testimony would be considered when deponent adequately explained conflict
• stating that \a party is not allowed to directly contradict prior sworn testimony to avoid the entry of a summary judgment\
• \General tort law permits recovery of all damages proximately caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant.\
• mental anguish and loss of wages compensable 'under the general law of torts and, thus, under Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1.' 611 So.2d at 315

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).