· 3/5/2010
McGlynn v. Huston
Citations
- 693 F. Supp. 2d 585
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20201
- 2010 WL 767040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding in light of post-removal stipulation because “the amount in controversy remains ambiguous”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James J. Brady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.