Mike Cohn, D.V.M. v. Petsmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “settlement letter is relevant evidence of the amount in controversy if it appears to reflect a reasonable estimate of the plaintiffs claim”
• holding that “[a] settlement letter is relevant evidence in the amount of controversy if it appears to reflect a reasonable estimate of the plaintiff’s claim”
• holding that a demand “is relevant evidence of 18 the amount in controversy if it appears to reflect a reasonable estimate of the plaintiff’s claim”
• holding that “[a] settlement letter is relevant evidence in the amount of controversy if it appears to reflect a reasonable estimate of the plaintiff’s claim”
• holding that “[a] settlement letter is relevant evidence in the amount of controversy if it appears to reflect a reasonable estimate of the plaintiff’s claim”
• holding that in an action seeking injunctive relief, “the amount in controversy is measured by the value of the object of the litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).