Luckett v. Delta Air Lines, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s alleged damages for property damage, travel expenses, an emergency ambulance trip, a stay in the hospital, and pain and suffering met the jurisdictional amount
• concluding that the jurisdictional amount was apparent on the face of the complaint when plaintiff specified in her complaint that she required an emergency ambulance trip and a six-day hospitalization, among other things
• holding that (\The Act does not completely preempt Mitchell's state-law negligence claims.\
• stating that, from “the face of the complaint,” the district court’s denial of remand was not error
• “Reading the face of the complaint, the district court did not err in finding that Luckett’s claims exceeded $75,000.”
• “Reading the face of the complaint, the district court did not err in finding that Luckett’s claims exceeded $75,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).