Skip to main content

McGee v. State

Citations

  • 19 So. 3d 1074
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14918
  • 2009 WL 3189171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no error in allowing the victim’s testimony about a sexual encounter that occurred on a separate date before the charged incident because it was inextricably intertwined with the charged crime
  • “[A]ny error in a guidelines scoresheet is harmless when the defendant is sentenced as a habitual offender”
  • “[A]ny error in a guidelines scoresheet is harmless when the defendant is sentenced as a habitual offender.”
  • “Any specific reason for reversal must be a specific reason that was advanced by the appellant in the trial court.”
  • a de novo standard of review applies to a motion for judgment of acquittal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner, Polen, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.