Skip to main content

Charles v. State

Citations

  • 79 So. 3d 233
  • 2012 WL 469748
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding it was error to allow a detective to testify that it was Charles who appeared on a surveillance video where the detective had no special familiarity with Charles
  • holding it was error to allow a detective to testify that it was Charles who appeared on a surveillance video where the detective had no special familiarity with Charles
  • holding it was error to allow a detective to testify that it was Charles who appeared on a surveillance video where the detective had no special familiarity with Charles
  • holding detective’s opinion testimony that defendant was person depicted in surveillance video invaded province of jury; detective was not eyewitness, had no special familiarity with defendant, and was not otherwise qualified as expert in video identification
  • finding court erred in allowing detective to testify that he could not identify the defendant as the person on the surveillance video the first time he watched it, but “he was later able to piece things together and identify the person in the video” as the defendant
  • finding court erred in allowing detective to testify that he could not identify the defendant as the person on the surveillance video the first time he watched it, but “he was later able to piece things together and identify the person in the video” as the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gross, Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.