McDow v. Rosado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing fee by 12% and explaining, “it is difficult to conclude that plaintiff achieved anything close to what was sought”
• “When the jury intends to fully compensate the plaintiff for his injuries, additional pre[]judgment interest would be punitive, rather than compensatory, . . . and the purpose of pre[]judgment interest is to be compensatory, not punitive” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).