Skip to main content
· 2/19/2010

Adorno v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

Citations

  • 685 F. Supp. 2d 507
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14692
  • 2010 WL 582045

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that courts should not exclude time spent on an unsuccessful claim where that claim is “interrelated and required essentially the same proof” as a successful claim
  • awarding $550/hour to plaintiffs lead counsel with over thirty years of experience; $500/hour to co-counsel less experienced in employment law, and $250/hour to mid-level associate with six years of experience in “complex and difficult” employment discrimination case
  • “A rate of $550 is ... consistent with rates awarded in this district for experienced'civil rights lawyers”
  • “A rate of $550 is . . . consistent with rates awarded in this district for experienced civil rights lawyers.”
  • “While block-billing is disfavored and may lack the specificity required for an award of attorneys’ fees, it is not prohibited as long as the [c]ourt can determine the reasonableness of the work performed.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “While block-billing is disfavored and may lack the specificity required for an award of attorneys’ fees, it is not prohibited as long as the [c]ourt can determine the reasonableness of the work performed.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.