McDonald v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant’s as-applied challenge failed because application of the statute to his conduct had no adverse impact on his personal due process rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William MacDonald v. Tim Moose
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-03-12· cited 39×
• Podracky v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-06-10· cited 27×
• Michael Jonthan Garland Saunders v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2014-02-04· cited 26×
• Adam Toghill v. Harold Clarke
  Fourth Circuit· 2017-12-15· cited 14×
• Robert Chianelli, Sr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2015-04-21· cited 3×
• Linnon v. Clarke
  E.D. Virginia· 2017-01-30· cited 2×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
• Lawrence v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 1,452×
• Eure v. Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2002-04-19· cited 154×
• UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. DALE ROBERT BACH, —
  Eighth Circuit· 2005-03-14· cited 63×
• State v. Senters
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2005-06-24· cited 47×
• In Re Phillips
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2003-01-10· cited 43×
• Wilby v. Gostel
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2003-04-17· cited 37×
• State v. Clinkenbeard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-11-29· cited 31×
• Parker v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-02-03· cited 26×
• Singson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-08· cited 25×
• United States v. Sherr
  D. Maryland· 2005-11-16· cited 15×
• Tjan v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2005-11-08· cited 13×
• MacK v. MacK
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1976-11-24· cited 8×