State v. Senters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that due process clause of Nebraska Constitution does not contain right of privacy broader than that recognized under federal Constitution
• concluding that, while a person might be old enough to consent to sexual relations, the legislature rationally concluded that an individual might not appreciate the ongoing effect of participation in pornography-thus justifying the difference in ages between the statutes
• concluding that, while a person might be old enough to consent to sexual relations, the legislature rationally concluded that an individual might not appreciate the ongoing effect of participation in pornography — thus justifying the difference in ages between the statutes
• “Although Senters also relies on the Nebraska Constitution, we note that our constitution does not contain a right of privacy broader than that recognized by the federal Constitution.”
• “When a law regulates sexual conduct involving a minor, Lawrence is inapplicable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).