First Circuit· 1/9/2013
McCullen v. Coakley
Citations
- 708 F.3d 1
- 2013 WL 85928
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that although leave should be freely given, it should not be 6 given when the amendment is futile
- “[A] plaintiff cannot rewardingly prosecute an as-applied challenge to the constitutionality of a statute based on the same legal arguments and factual predicate that underpinned an earlier (unsuccessful) facial challenge.”
- “As a general rule, [d]ismissal without leave to amend is improper 11 unless it is clear . . . that the complaint could not be saved by any amendment.” (quotation 12 omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Stahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 3,406×
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoFirst Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 2,914×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 1,732×
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,551×
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 1,399×
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court· 2010-04-20· cited 1,327×
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court· 1989-06-29· cited 1,218×
- Snyder v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 2011-03-02· cited 867×
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 780×
- City of Ladue v. GilleoSupreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 627×
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 516×
- Christopher J. Farrell v. Corey Burke and Gregory Freeman, Docket No. 05-0169 CvSecond Circuit· 2006-05-31· cited 503×
- Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court· 1990-03-27· cited 396×
- Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western NYSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 347×
- Grajales v. Puerto Rico Ports AuthorityFirst Circuit· 2012-06-13· cited 337×
- Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedFirst Circuit· 2001-12-17· cited 309×
- Marcavage v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2012-08-02· cited 173×
- NEPSK, Inc. v. Town of HoultonFirst Circuit· 2002-03-13· cited 136×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.