McConnaughey v. Building Components, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “The party moving for protection under the statute of repose must show[, inter alia, their] activity [is] within the class which is protected by the statute”
• providing that “The party moving for protection under the statute of repose must show[, inter alia, their] activity [is] within the class which is protected by the statute”
• requiring defendant to show actions “within the class which is protected by the [SOR]”
• manufacturer of preconstructed roof trusses was not protected because the manufacturer acted only in the capacity of marketer and supplier
• “When construing statutes under Pennsylvania law, it is assumed that the legislature does not intend a result which is absurd or unreasonable.”
• “When construing statutes under Pennsylvania law, it is assumed that the legislature does not intend a result which is absurd or unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).