Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 3/8/1994

McConnaughey v. Building Components, Inc.

Citations

  • 637 A.2d 1331
  • 536 Pa. 95
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 43

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “The party moving for protection under the statute of repose must show[, inter alia, their] activity [is] within the class which is protected by the statute”
  • providing that “The party moving for protection under the statute of repose must show[, inter alia, their] activity [is] within the class which is protected by the statute”
  • requiring defendant to show actions “within the class which is protected by the [SOR]”
  • manufacturer of preconstructed roof trusses was not protected because the manufacturer acted only in the capacity of marketer and supplier
  • “When construing statutes under Pennsylvania law, it is assumed that the legislature does not intend a result which is absurd or unreasonable.”
  • “When construing statutes under Pennsylvania law, it is assumed that the legislature does not intend a result which is absurd or unreasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named McConnaughey v. Building Components, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.