· 10/31/1995
Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Carl E. Baker, Inc.
Citations
- 667 A.2d 404
- 446 Pa. Super. 481
- 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- quashing appeal where order granting judgment on the pleadings dismissed additional defendants but left pending the claims against the original defendant
- quashing appeal where order granting judgment on the pleadings dismissed additional defendants but left pending the claims against the original defendant
- judgment on pleading as to additional defendant left undisturbed action against original defendant — appeal quashed
- “In interpreting a statute, we are also required to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the legislature as expressed in the statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Popovich, Saylor, Brosky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.