Marks v. Tasman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a non-moving party’s deposition created a genuine issue of material fact for trial
• denying summary judgment where a material fact was unresolved as to whether a defect in the sidewalk caused the claimant’s injury
• decided under materially similar predecessor rule 1035(d)
• decided under materially similar predecessor Rule 1035(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).