McCollum v. D'Arcy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, proponent of recovered memory still bore burden to validate phenomenon of memory repression itself and admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom
• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, proponent of recovered memory still bore burden to validate phenomenon of memory repression itself and admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom
• noting that although discovery rule applied to toll statute of limitations, the proponent of recovered memory still bore “the burden ... to validate the phenomenon of memory repression itself and the admissibility of evidence flowing therefrom”
• guoting Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & C o ., 123 N.H. 512, 523-24, 464 A.2d 288, 294 (1983)
• issue decided on discovery rule grounds; therefore, court need not address fraudulent concealment argument
• although “arise” and “accrue” are not synonymous, “these two events often occur simultaneously”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• S.V. v. R.V.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-03-14· cited 816×
• Doe v. Roe
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-04-07· cited 160×
• Logerquist v. Danforth
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-03· cited 84×
• Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of God
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 81×
• Farris v. Compton
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-12-29· cited 74×
• Conrad v. Hazen
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-09-27· cited 44×
• State v. Hungerford
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-07-01· cited 36×
• Keshishian v. CMC Radiologists
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-07-15· cited 34×
• Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of God
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 19×
• Glines v. Bruk
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-08-22· cited 17×
• McCreary v. Weast
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 12×
• Dobe v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-02-22· cited 8×
• Sv v. Rv
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-11-15· cited 7×
• Maness v. Gordon
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-03-21· cited 4×
• Fothergill v. Seabreeze Condominiums at Hampton Ass'n
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-06· cited 4×
• Taylor v. Litteer
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-05-16· cited 1×
• Taylor v. Litteer
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-06-26
• Duguay v. Androscoggin Valley Hosp.
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-01-25
• Cummings v. Bartlett
  D. New Hampshire· 1997-06-19
• Cummings v. Bartlett
  D. New Hampshire· 1996-01-23

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tyson v. Tyson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-10-30· cited 106×
• Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-02-28· cited 103×
• State v. Cressey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-07-15· cited 94×
• Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-07-18· cited 91×
• Lakeman v. LaFrance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1959-12-01· cited 55×
• Meiers-Post v. Schafer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-07-19· cited 53×
• Shillady v. Elliot Community Hospital
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-05-31· cited 44×
• Rowe v. John Deere
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-15· cited 40×
• French v. R. S. Audley, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-07-13· cited 22×
• McKee v. Riordan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-11-30· cited 15×
• Waid v. Ford Motor Co.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-10-26· cited 14×
• Stanley v. Walsh
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-10-03· cited 4×