Skip to main content
· 10/3/1996

Logerquist v. Danforth

Citations

  • 932 P.2d 281
  • 188 Ariz. 16
  • 227 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 22
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim tolls when a person is “unable to manage his affairs or to understand his legal rights or liabilities.”
  • “[T]he statute of limitations defense 5 is not favored. . . . Application of the discovery rule often depends on resolution of such 6 factual issues, this court’s function is not to resolve disputed facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelander, Livermore, Flórez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.