McClure v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying standing to U.S. Senator challenging validity of federal judge’s confirmation noting that “merely [because] he was on the losing side” did not mean his vote was impaired in the sense of Coleman
• no standing because effectiveness of Senator’s vote not impaired
• no standing because effectiveness of Senator’s vote not impaired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).