Skip to main content
· 8/14/1974

Edward M. Kennedy v. Arthur F. Sampson, Acting Administrator, General Services Administration, (Two Cases)

Citations

  • 511 F.2d 430
  • 167 U.S. App. D.C. 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that legislators have standing to challenge constitutionality o f pocket veto
  • finding a U.S. Senator has standing to challenge the President's use of the pocket veto
  • Presidential vetoes are returnable during an intrasession recess if Congress provides for the receipt of messages from the President during the recess
  • “[Ajppellee’s object in this lawsuit is to vindicate the effectiveness of his vote. No more essential interest could be asserted by a legislator.”
  • action for mandamus and declaratory judgment to force publication of law, which plaintiff voted for, that had remained unpublished due to attempted, but legally ineffective pocket veto
  • For a discussion of this aspect of the Kennedy case, see text at notes 111 to 112, infra.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Fahy, Tamm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.