Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/16/1974

McCleeary v. Wirtz

Citations

222 N.W.2d 409
1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a “subject will not be considered” where a “random discussion” is not supported by a legal argument and citation to authority
holding that a “subject will not be considered” where a “random discussion” is not supported by a legal argument and citation to authority
holding “subject [would] not be considered” where the plaintiff engaged only in a “random discussion of their trial difficulty” and failed to assign an issue, advance an argument, or cite authority “in support of the speculative position taken”
noting “random discussion” of an issue “will not be considered” on appeal
noting “random discussion” of an issue “will not be considered” on appeal
“[T]he cited rule allows nothing more than [c]orrection of a record already made, not the [m]aking of an additional 6 record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rawlings, Moore, Rawl-Ings, Legrand, Uhlenhopp, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.