Winter v. Honeggers'& Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding veterinarian testimony that the negligent design of a hog confinement facility possibly caused an illness to hogs coupled with testimony that the hogs were not affected with the illness before the use of the facility was sufficient on the question of causation
• Expert testimony indicating probability or likelihood of a causal connection is sufficient to generate a fact question on causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).