Bandstra v. International Harvester Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when owner’s manual advised of dangers of climbing a ladder over blower machinery, but machinery itself did not contain this warning, jury question existed on whether defendant’s warning was inadequate because it did not appear on machinery itself
• “[Rule 407 of the Iowa Rules of Evidence] does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent measures when offered in connection with a claim based on ... breach of warranty.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).