McCarty v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a conviction for prostitution was supported by sufficient evidence where implied offers were made by both the defendant and the arresting officer
• holding that conviction for prostitution was supported by sufficient evidence where implied offers were made by both defendant and arresting officer
• holding that protracted negotiations between the officer and the defendant over price, which included implied offers by both parties, constituted factually sufficient evidence to support a conviction for prostitution
• defendant \haggled\ over price of explicit sexual act she had proposed
• “The definition of prostitution as being a person who engages or agrees or offers to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee is not so vague as to make persons of common intelligence guess at its meaning.”
• section 43.02(a)(1)’s term of “offer” is not unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Mattias v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-29· cited 190×
• Austin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-06· cited 74×
• Frieling v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-02-22· cited 32×
• Ozack v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-16· cited 27×
• Schneider v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1997-10-29· cited 23×
• Steinbach v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-11-13· cited 20×
• Tisdale v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1983-01-12· cited 17×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-22· cited 15×
• Morris v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-05-30· cited 13×
• State v. Moreno
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1992-01-09· cited 8×
• Bartmess v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1986-03-27· cited 8×
• Roper v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-18· cited 7×
• Thornberg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-28· cited 2×
• Phillips, Robert L. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-19
• Sun Ju Kim v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-05-28
• Rhonda Jean Cowan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-03-04
• Helen Steinbach v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-11-13
• Reuben T. Press v. Willie Elizabeth Press
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-05-29
• Douglas W. Frieling v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-01-17
• Wu, Fung Che v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-04-12

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Grayned v. City of Rockford
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
• Broadrick v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
• Connally v. General Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
• Dombrowski v. Pfister
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
• United States v. Harriss
  Supreme Court· 1954-06-07· cited 1,827×
• Lanzetta v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
• Winters v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1948-05-03· cited 1,240×
• United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
• United States v. Petrillo
  Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 896×
• Rose v. Locke
  Supreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 516×
• Williams v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-23· cited 318×
• Wainwright v. Stone
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 316×
• United States v. Wurzbach
  Supreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 258×
• Robinson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1945-03-05· cited 243×
• United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a\chiquito\
  Second Circuit· 1978-08-03· cited 77×