United States v. Carlos Herrera, Victor Hugo Herrera, and Felipe Santiago Herrera, A/k/a\chiquito\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Substantive cases brought under [18 U.S.C.] § 1952 have been uniform in their holdings that it is unnecessary to prove a defendant had actual knowledge of the jurisdictional element, and that he actually agreed and intended to use interstate facilities to commit a crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).