· 1/14/2016
McCarthy v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Citations
- 809 F.3d 1365
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 560
- 2016 WL 158471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Board’s jurisdiction over an IRA appeal is “limited to those issues that have been previously raised with OSC.”
- noting that “the focus of the exhaustion requirement is on substance,” rather than whether the appellant correctly affixed legal labels to the facts alleged
- finding that distinct dis- closures require exhaustion as to each
- finding that distinct dis- closures require exhaustion as to each
- find- ing no exhaustion to “different disclosures” not identified in the OSC complaint
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Prost, Lourie, Wallach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.