Skip to main content
· 1/14/2016

McCarthy v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Citations

  • 809 F.3d 1365
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 560
  • 2016 WL 158471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Board’s jurisdiction over an IRA appeal is “limited to those issues that have been previously raised with OSC.”
  • noting that “the focus of the exhaustion requirement is on substance,” rather than whether the appellant correctly affixed legal labels to the facts alleged
  • finding that distinct dis- closures require exhaustion as to each
  • finding that distinct dis- closures require exhaustion as to each
  • find- ing no exhaustion to “different disclosures” not identified in the OSC complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Lourie, Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.