MacH Mining, LLC v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court improperly refused to strike confidential materials based in its view that it should review “descriptions of the conciliation process”
• holding that “a clear statement from 17 Congress is required before we conclude that a statute withdraws the original 18 jurisdiction of the district courts”
• concluding that a sworn affidavit from the EEOC stating that it attempted to conciliate will usually establish that the EEOC has met its obligation to conciliate
• recognizing that \the purpose behind Title VII” is to \eliminat[e] discrimination in the workplace”
• concluding that the district court “failed to give effect to the law’s non-disclosure provision”
• holding that judicial review of the EEOC’s duty to attempt conciliation of claims is “narrow,” which “reflect[s] the abundant discretion the law gives the EEOC.to decide the kind and extent of discussions appropriate in a given case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).