Skip to main content

McCalment v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Citations

  • 860 N.E.2d 884
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 181
  • 2007 WL 258323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that oral statements did not constitute a contract where plaintiff “was not obligated to perform anything or refrain from doing something”
  • dismissing a claim where “the facts alleged ... are incapable of showing detrimental reliance”
  • affirming trial court’s decision to grant motion to dismiss on promissory estoppel claim
  • “Detrimental reliance is also an element of negligent misrepresentation. ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Najam, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.