Mart v. Forest River, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Connecticut’s three-year statute of limitations for state personal injury claims to § 1983 claim
• “The Second Circuit has clearly stated that ‘only admissible evidence need be considered by the trial court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment.’” (quoting Raskin v. Wyatt Co., 125 F.3d 55, 66 (2d Cir. 1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).