Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/14/1993
McArdle v. Tronetti
Citations
- 627 A.2d 1219
- 426 Pa. Super. 607
- 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, under Pennsylvania law, “res judicata generally is thought to turn on the essential similarity of the underlying events giving rise to the various legal claims”
- finding a lack of identity between two sets of claims-federal constitutional violations and state law gross negligence-because they involved distinct factual allegations and elements
- noting that conclusion is consistent with Restatement (Second
- noting that conclusion is consistent with Restatement (Second
- “As to the identity of eause[s] of action, rather than resting upon the specific legal theory invoked, res judicata generally is thought to turn on the essential similarity of the underlying events giving rise to the various legal claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Johnson, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Deanna Turner v. Crawford Square Apartments Iii, L.P. McCormack Baron Management Services, IncThird Circuit· 2006-05-31· cited 221×
- Lerner v. LernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-08-07· cited 134×
- Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-25· cited 66×
- Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-22· cited 45×
- Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-10-09· cited 44×
- Tucker v. Philadelphia Daily NewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-28· cited 34×
- Weinar, M. v. Lex, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-15· cited 27×
- Khalil, A. v. Cole, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-10-02· cited 25×
- Rearick v. Elderton State BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-07-23· cited 23×
- Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-06-26· cited 19×
- RUTH F. v. Robert B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-06· cited 17×
- Scott v. MershonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-02· cited 14×
- Butler v. Charles Powers EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-07· cited 11×
- Singleton v. Jas Auto. LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-05-01· cited 8×
- PG Publishing Co. v. AicheleW.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-10-09· cited 7×
- Russo v. City of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-05-11· cited 2×
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nN.D. Illinois· 2012-10-12· cited 2×
- Sheils v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In re Fleming)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-05-14· cited 1×
- Turner v. Crawford Square AptThird Circuit· 2006-05-31
- Kiec v. SherrerdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-08
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thelma DAVIS v. UNITED STATES STEEL SUPPLY, DIVISION OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, AppellantThird Circuit· 1982-08-30· cited 144×
- Yania v. BiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-11-09· cited 102×
- Brant v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1983-02-28· cited 99×
- Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-11-13· cited 83×
- In Re Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-01· cited 63×
- LERAMAN v. RudolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-03-17· cited 52×
- Dyer v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-03· cited 35×
- Rose v. WissingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-08· cited 34×
- Mintz v. Carlton House Partners, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-07· cited 33×
- Greenspan v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-20· cited 31×
- Melat v. MelatSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-28· cited 29×
Other cases named McArdle v. Tronetti
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.