· 1/28/1992
Melat v. Melat
Citations
- 602 A.2d 380
- 411 Pa. Super. 647
- 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A modification does not displace a prior valid contract; rather, the new contract acts as a substitute for the original contract, but only to the extent that it alters it. The original contract may be abrogated in part, with the residue remaining intact.”
- summary judgment standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McEwen, Olszewski, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.