United States v. Joseph Lussier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court did not sequester the IRS agent who testified as to the amount of tax due as a summation of testimony by other witnesses
• \The statute itself makes no provision for such an extreme alteration of normal trial arrangements.\
• “It is well settled that a district court has personal jurisdiction over any party who appears before it, regardless of how his appearance was obtained.”
• question of the propriety of defendant's incarceration as a result of his refusal to provide booking information is moot after defendant has provided the information and been released
• evidence properly excluded where no connection between proffered evidence and defendant's subjective belief
• question _______ of the propriety of defendant's incarceration as a result of his refusal to provide booking information is moot after defendant has provided the information and been released

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).