Skip to main content

Mays v. State

Citations

  • 719 N.E.2d 1263
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 2030
  • 1999 WL 1051952

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that defendant challenging search of apartment building atrium and seizure of cocaine, in case charging possession of cocaine, did not admit possessory interest in cocaine \for obvious reasons\
  • explaining that defendant challenging search of apartment building atrium and seizure of cocaine, in case charging possession of cocaine, did not admit possessory interest in cocaine “for obvious reasons”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Staton, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.