Martin v. Dunlap

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Respondent’s counsel had no knowledge of the name of the witness ... nor the exhibits hereinafter questioned, prior to the first day of trial.... ”
• considerable latitude is allowed in the cross-examination of a witness to test the accuracy of his memory, bias, prejudice, interest or credibility; in doing so, the witness may be asked about irrelevant matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).