Eighth Circuit· 8/5/1996

Mausolf v. Babbitt

Citations

85 F.3d 1295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that standing existed where prospective interve-nors sought to prevent plaintiffs from succeeding in vacating new, more restrictive national park use-restrictions
finding that the members of a snowmobiling club had standing to challenge regulations restricting trail use that were being actively enforced and prevented the members from viewing wildlife
stating that “when one of the parties is an arm or agency of the government, and the case concerns a matter of sovereign interest ... the government is presumed to represent the interests of all its citizens” (internal quotations omitted)
requiring prospective Rule 24(a) intervenors to demonstrate the existence of an Article III case or controversy
requiring prospective Rule 24(a) intervenors to demonstrate the existence of an Article III case or controversy
adopting the approach “that the Constitution requires that proposed intervenors have Article III standing to litigate their claims in federal court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Mausolf v. Babbitt

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.