Public Service v. NH Consumer Advocate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that this requirement \is more than a paper tiger\
• “Because we affirm the denial of [appellants’] motions to intervene, they lack standing to press any other issues before this court.”
• “The district court’s denial of a motion for intervention ... lays the foundation for an immediate appeal.”
• petitioner lacks right to intervene where “no divergence of interest between the two bodies in respect to the causes of action pleaded”
• “The failure to satisfy any one of [the four factors] dooms intervention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).