Utah Ass'n of Counties v. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that organizations whose purpose is the protection and conservation of wildlife have a protectable interest
• concluding that interests were not identical even though the government and the intervenor both sought to uphold the proclamation creating a national monument
• concluding that interests were not identical even though the government and the intervenor both sought to uphold the proclamation creating a national monument
• concluding that a wildlife photographer who had been instrumental in the decision to list an owl under the Endangered Species Act possessed a legal interest
• noting that application of the interest requirement of Rule 24(a) is \highly fact-specific\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that application of the interest requirement of Rule 24(a) is “highly fact-specific” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).