Skip to main content
· 1/11/1984

Maurice Sternberg, Inc. v. James

Citations

  • 577 F. Supp. 882
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • not arising out of where “offers and rejections [were] interposed between” visit to forum state and the agreement ultimately entered into
  • “The fact that the Illinois plaintiff’s part of the contract was to be performed in Illinois is not transacting business for jurisdictional purposes.”
  • no personal jurisdiction where defendant entered the forum state on two occasions for reasons wholly unrelated to the plaintiff or the dispute
  • phone calls insufficient regardless of who phones first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.