Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. BioValve Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that isolated telephone and e-mail communications, alone, are insufficient bases for asserting personal jurisdiction, although sustained contact over the course of several months could be sufficient
• “BioValve’s two visits to Illinois, particularly considered alongside BioValve’s ongoing communication with Abbott’s Illinois facilities and employees, all related to the negotiation and performance of the DAR-0100 contract, merit an exercise of personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Agri-Best Holdings, LLC v. Atlanta Cattle Exchange, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-08-02· cited 33×
• MacNeil v. Trambert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-03· cited 28×
• Mission Measurement Corp. v. Blackbaud, Inc.
  E.D. Illinois· 2017-12-13· cited 26×
• Wendt v. Handler, Thayer & Duggan, LLC
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-05-11· cited 11×
• Siegel v. HSBC Holdings, PLC
  E.D. Illinois· 2017-08-14· cited 10×
• Eagle Air Transport, Inc. v. National Aerotech Aviation Delaware, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-12-18· cited 8×
• Centurion Service Group, LLC v. SBMC Healthcare, LLC
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-05-07· cited 4×
• Lexington Ins. Co. v. Zurich Ins. (Taiwan) Ltd.
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2017-12-21· cited 3×
• Primack v. Pearl B. Polto, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-07-08· cited 1×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• International Shoe Co. v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Hanson v. Denckla
  Supreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
• Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
• Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 3,642×
• Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-08-04· cited 723×
• Hyatt International Corp. v. Gerardo Coco
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 377×
• Rar, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Turner Diesel, Limited
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-03-03· cited 330×
• Rollins v. Ellwood
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 261×
• Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-11-22· cited 209×
• Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1979-06-08· cited 207×
• Kostal v. Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, P.C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-15· cited 92×
• Loretta Klump v. J. David Duffus, Jr., Law Offices of Dixon, Duffus & Doub, a Partnership, and Accident and Injury Referral Service
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-01-12· cited 90×
• Logan Productions, Inc. v. Optibase, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-12-19· cited 75×
• Wisconsin Electrical Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Pennant Products, Inc., and County of Monroe Industrial Development Agency
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-04-23· cited 74×
• Chalek v. Klein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-06· cited 23×
• Maurice Sternberg, Inc. v. James
  N.D. Illinois· 1984-01-11· cited 19×
• Ruprecht Co. v. Sysco Food Services of Seattle, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-11-30· cited 17×
• F. McConnell & Sons, Inc. v. Target Data Systems, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 1999-02-02· cited 12×