Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. BioValve Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that isolated telephone and e-mail communications, alone, are insufficient bases for asserting personal jurisdiction, although sustained contact over the course of several months could be sufficient
• “BioValve’s two visits to Illinois, particularly considered alongside BioValve’s ongoing communication with Abbott’s Illinois facilities and employees, all related to the negotiation and performance of the DAR-0100 contract, merit an exercise of personal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).