Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an offeree’s rejection of an offer of employment after an interview in Chicago could not form the basis of jurisdiction over the defendant employment agency in Illinois even where the offeree later accepted ostensibly the same offer after an interview in Missouri
• nonresident defendant did not transact any business in Illinois giving rise to cause of action, nor was it “doing business” in Illinois
• boundaries of Illinois statute are not to be equated with the test under the due process clause
• boundaries of Illinois statute are not to be equated with the test under the due process clause
• \[T]he boundaries or limits under our statute are not to be equated with the 'minimum contacts’ test under the due process clause.\
• \the boundaries or limits under [the Illinois] statute are not to be equated with the 'minimum contacts' test under the due process clause\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).