Mauldin v. Dyna-Color/Jack Rabbit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the policy in South Carolina is to liberally construe the Workers’ Compensation Act in favor of coverage
• awarding compensation when claimant suffered only intermittent minor knee pain and swelling until she was diagnosed with torn meniscus requiring surgery two and a half years later
• rejecting “mechanical” application of “accident” statute of limitations in favor of discovery rule for “accident” statute of limitations when claimant could not have known seriousness and work-relatedness of injury until after expiration of limitations period
• stating a workers' compensation claim must be for a \compensable\ injury
• stating a workers’ compensation claim must be for a “compensable” injury
• two-year limitation period provided in Section 42-15-40 runs from the date claimant discovered the compensable injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Shealy v. Aiken County
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-24· cited 181×
• Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-09-20· cited 40×
• Lester v. South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 33×
• Porter v. Labor Depot
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-05· cited 24×
• Hernandez-Zuniga v. Tickle
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-06-14· cited 24×
• Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police Department
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-05-21· cited 22×
• Hopper v. Terry Hunt Construction
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-23· cited 20×
• Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of God
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-18· cited 19×
• Schurlknight v. City of North Charleston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 16×
• Pee v. AVM, INC.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 16×
• Holmes v. National Service Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-10-24· cited 15×
• Nelson v. Yellow Cab Co.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-10-09· cited 12×
• Ellison v. Frigidaire Home Products
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-11-20· cited 11×
• Bentley v. Spartanburg County
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-07-11· cited 9×
• Rogers v. Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-08-18· cited 8×
• Pee v. AVM, INC.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-08· cited 6×
• White v. Medical University
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-11· cited 6×
• Laracuente Santiago v. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2003-08-15· cited 4×
• Earl v. HTH Associates, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-02-27· cited 3×
• Schurlknight v. City of North Charleston
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santee Portland Cement Co. v. Daniel International Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-05· cited 58×
• Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-08-29· cited 25×
• Gattis v. Chavez
  D. South Carolina· 1976-01-05· cited 25×
• Krell v. South Carolina State Highway Department
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1961-02-03· cited 17×
• Brayboy v. Clark Heating Co., Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-10-07· cited 15×
• Davis v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-06-09· cited 11×
• Mauldin V. Dyna-Color/Jjack Rabbit
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1990-12-10· cited 2×