Peay v. U.S. Silica Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Wjorkers’ compensation statutes are construed liberally in favor of coverage. It follows that any exception to workers’ compensation coverage must be narrowly construed.” (internal citation omitted)
• “[W]orkers’ compensation statutes are construed liberally in favor of coverage. It follows that any exception to workers’ compensation coverage must be narrowly construed.”
• “[Ojnly those injuries inflicted by an employer [or co-employee] who acts with a deliberate or specific intent to injure are exempted from the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).