Lee v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plea counsel was not deficient for failing to investigate the petitioner's mental health, even though the petitioner had a history of mental retardation, because she had no indication of his mental status
• explaining a psychiatrist’s testimony that an applicant’s “mental status dated back to when he was in school and he had a documented history of mental retarda tion was sufficient to show a reasonable probability that he was incompetent at the time of the plea”
• “Any evidence of probative value to support the PCR court’s factual findings is sufficient to uphold those findings on appeal.”
• \Any evidence of probative value to support the PCR court's factual findings is sufficient to uphold those findings on appeal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilds v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-02-05· cited 8×
• Mangal v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-12-30· cited 3×
• Ramirez v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 2×
• Smalls v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-02-10· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Cherry v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-04· cited 215×
• Caprood v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
• Solomon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-04-18· cited 30×
• State v. Blair
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-01-05· cited 29×
• Shumpert v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 14×
• Matthews v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-04-26· cited 9×