Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 1/21/1992

Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker Company

Citations

  • 954 F.2d 434
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 879
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 650
  • 1992 WL 6954

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court may look beyond face of the complaint to determine if plaintiff \artfully pleaded\ matters under state law that actually raise a federal question
  • stating that plaintiffs may not \omit federal questions that are essential to recovery\
  • “[F]ederal jurisdiction exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of the plaintiff’s properly pleaded complaint.”
  • removal justified were plaintiff artfully pleaded state-law cause of action
  • expressly not addressing the district court's ruling on complete preemption
  • applying rule to challenge to execution of settlement agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Coffey, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Matthew Burda v. M. Ecker Company

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.