Skip to main content

Matter of Johnson

Citations

  • 933 P.2d 1019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding incorrect calculation of offender score is a fundamental defect in a sentence resulting in a miscarriage of justice and requiring relief under a PRP
  • holding incorrect calculation of offender score is a fundamental defect in a sentence resulting in a miscarriage of justice and requiring relief under a PRP
  • intervening change in statutory interpretation “must be applied retroactively” because “[o]nce the Court has determined the meaning of a statute, that is what the statute has meant since its enactment” (citing In re Pers. Restraint of Vandervlugt, 120 Wn.2d 427, 436, 842 P.2d 950 (1992
  • “Once the Court has determined the meaning of a statute, that is what the statute has meant since its enactment.”
  • a sentencing court acts without statutory authority under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 when it imposes a sentence based on a miscalculated offender score
  • a sentencing court acts without statutory authority under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 when it imposes a sentence based on a miscalculated offender score

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Talmadge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Matter of Johnson

36 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.