In Re Turay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the constitutional requirement of proving a recent overt act was \established\ in Young
• holding the one year time-limit on collateral attack in criminal cases applies to SVP proceedings
• holding the one year time-limit on collateral attack in criminal cases applies to SVP proceedings
• noting that the constitutional requirement of proving a recent overt act was “established” in Young
• stating that an appellate decision that merely settles a point of law without overturning precedent, or applies settled law to new facts, does not constitute a significant change in the law
• stating that an appellate decision that merely settles a point of law without overturning precedent, or applies settled law to new facts, does not constitute a significant change in the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).