Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/11/1995
Matter of Decker
Citations
- 471 S.E.2d 462
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the press may constitutionally be prohibited from publishing information about trials if necessary to assure a fair trial by an impartial tribunal
- “A statute should be so construed that no word, clause, sentence, provision or part shall be rendered surplusage, or superfluous.” (citation omitted)
- a statute should be construed so that no word, clause, provision, or part is rendered superfluous
- “A statute should be so construed that no word, clause, sentence, provision or part shall be rendered surplusage, or superfluous ....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-25· cited 76×
- State v. ByramSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 57×
- Pike v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-09-28· cited 15×
- Lightner v. Hampton Hall Club, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-02-01· cited 7×
- 16 Jade Street, LLC v. R. Design Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-04-04· cited 6×
- Allen Ex Rel. Doe v. South Carolina Public Employee Benefit AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-03-04· cited 4×
- Hartsock v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires N. Am. Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-04-25· cited 3×
- Sierra Club v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. Control & Chem-Nuclear Sys., LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-03-27· cited 3×
- Abraham v. Palmetto Unified School District No. 1Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-09-11· cited 3×
- State v. JihadSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-17· cited 3×
- Protection & Advocacy for People with Disabilities, Inc. v. BuscemiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-06-08· cited 2×
- Boyle ex rel. Estate of Boyle v. United StatesD. South Carolina· 2012-08-07· cited 2×
- Abraham v. PALMETTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-09-11
- Aiken v. SCDORSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-02-12
- State v. HeywardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-10-07
- In re Jairus J. V.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-04
- Olds v. City of Goose CreekSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-08-08
- Planned Parenthood South Atlantic v. State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-01-05
- USAA Casualty v. RaffertySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-03-29
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 2,202×
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 1,418×
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court· 1936-02-10· cited 923×
- Zemel v. RuskSupreme Court· 1965-10-11· cited 827×
- United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnSecond Circuit· 1983-01-28· cited 199×
- United States v. Cuthbertson, Gerald M. Appeal of Cbs Inc., Third Party WitnessThird Circuit· 1980-07-23· cited 198×
- Zerilli v. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1981-04-13· cited 190×
- Larouche v. National Broadcasting Co.Fourth Circuit· 1986-01-09· cited 162×
- Murray W. (Dusty) Miller v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Transamerican Press of Texas, Inc. And Mike ParkhurstFifth Circuit· 1980-07-15· cited 151×
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Midwestern Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 107×
- In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-09-21· cited 101×
- Rosato v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-09-08· cited 65×
- William T. Farr v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles CountyNinth Circuit· 1975-09-12· cited 64×
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Storer Communications, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1987-02-06· cited 57×
- United States v. LiddyDistrict of Columbia· 1972-12-19· cited 41×
- In the Matter of the Proceedings of Witness Before the Grand Jury Re Will Lewis, Will Lewis v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1975-05-19· cited 29×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-11· cited 29×
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-20· cited 26×
- Karem v. PriestW.D. Texas· 1990-06-19· cited 7×
Other cases named Matter of Decker
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.