Lightner v. Hampton Hall Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The cardinal rule of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and effectuate the legislative intent whenever possible.\ (quoting Mitchell v. City of Greenville, 411 S.C. 632, 634, 770 S.E.2d 391, 392 (2015))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aiken v. SCDOR
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2020-02-12
• Lemmons v. Macedonia Water Works, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-07-01
• SCD of Commerce v. Clemson University
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-11-18
• Cromey v. SCDOR
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-08-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
• Hodges v. Rainey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 371×
• Town of Summerville v. City of North Charleston
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-19· cited 110×
• Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial Commission
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-07-07· cited 72×
• University of Southern California v. Moran
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-07-18· cited 30×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-11· cited 29×
• Matter of Decker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-07-11· cited 24×
• Lambries v. Saluda County Council
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-06-18· cited 21×
• State v. Ramsey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-16· cited 9×
• Mitchell v. City of Greenville
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-03-12· cited 8×
• Florence County Democratic Party v. Florence County Republican Party
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-05· cited 8×
• Drummond v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-06-02· cited 3×