Matlock v. Data Processing Security, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sufficient consideration found to support non-competition agreements signed by em ployees even though they had already entered service of employer where employees were required to execute agreements if they desired to continue their employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henderson v. KRTS, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-01-16· cited 30×
• TransPerfect Translations, Inc. v. Leslie
  S.D. Texas· 2009-01-12· cited 26×
• University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. Than
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-06-16· cited 21×
• Puritan-Bennett Corp. v. Richter
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1983-01-20· cited 20×
• Research & Trading Corp. v. Powell
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1983-10-12· cited 11×
• Atlantic Richfield Co. v. ANR Pipeline Co.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1989-02-02· cited 8×
• In Re GHR Energy Corp.
  S.D. Texas· 1986-05-27· cited 8×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• W. A. Ryan & Co. v. M., K. & T. R'y Co.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1886-01-08· cited 85×
• Lewis v. Krueger, Hutchinson and Overton Clinic
  Texas Supreme Court· 1954-06-30· cited 60×
• Spinks v. Riebold
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1958-02-19· cited 42×
• Mamlin v. Susan Thomas, Incorporated
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1973-01-18· cited 35×
• Wright Hydraulics, Inc. v. Womack MacHine Supply Co.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1972-05-26· cited 7×